Sunday, April 23, 2023
Adobe acrobat x pro text box font size free.PDF/X-, PDF/A-, and PDF/E-compliant files (Acrobat Pro)
Looking for:
Adobe acrobat x pro text box font size free |
Create PDFs with PDFMaker in Adobe Acrobat (Windows).Adobe acrobat x pro text box font size free
PDF/X-, PDF/A-, and PDF/E-compliant files (Adobe Acrobat Pro).Convert to PDF/X, PDF/A, or PDF/E using a profile
Adobe Acrobat - Wikipedia.Adobe acrobat x pro text box font size free
Vmware fusion 11 pro discount code free download.VMware Coupon Code | Save with Jul Discounts
Looking for:
Vmware fusion 11 pro discount code free download |
Vmware fusion 11 pro discount code free download
Here are the best features of VMware Fusion:. VMware fusion works with different ways to run so many windows applications on Mac.
It is needed when we need to run both mac and windows at the same time then we need to have virtualization software. VMware fusion is ready to give that virtualization software to run both the mac and windows at the same time while using mac OS. Here are the factors which indicate and tell you how it works. One more thing is right now you also have a great option to buy this because we offer a VMware Fusion pro-education coupon which is useful for you for getting a heavy discount while you purchase it.
Basically, when you going to buy this fusion pro you will have to choose its latest version from its top 4 plans. The price of all of its plan is very affordable for you. It is one of the best options for buying any of the fusion plans at a much discounted price. So here are the top 4 versions of fusion, you can choose anyone from it according to your needs. Right now this is a great offer for you if you going to buy fusion for your mac device. We offer one of the latest and exclusive savings and discount deals which give the biggest save of your money at the time of billing any its product.
If you ever looking for some discount options then your search ends here. From our webtechcoupons. VMware fusion is the perfect illusion virtualization application for all Mac users. Vmware Fusion 12 pro coupon code, Vmware workstation 16 pro coupon code. VMware Fusion Pro takes virtualization on the Mac to the next level with powerful features designed for advanced users, developers and IT admins. With leading edge desktop virtualization features and added cloud capabilities.
With the ability to assign 64GB of memory, 16 virtual processors and 2GB of graphics memory per virtual machine, Fusion Pro delivers leading edge features for running Windows on a Mac. And, with innovative tools such as linked clones, virtual network editor with IPv6 support, and connectivity to. Get This Deal. Never miss a coupon! Let us notify you when fresh coupons are found. VMware fusion is the perfect …. VMware WorkStation 16 Pro. Upgrade to Fusion 12 Pro 1 used today.
Save with the Current Promotions 2 used today. Shop vSphere Essentials 2 used today. VMware Current Promotions 2 used today. VMware Free Trials 1 used today. Fusion or Fusion Pro Trial 1 used today. VMware Online Store 2 used today. Capterra Workstation 1 used today. VMware Store 1 used today. Europe - VMware Europe 1 used today. VMware Horizon 1 used today. France - VMware France Store 1 used today.
Netherlands - VMware Netherlands 2 used today. You will also get a. July coupon codes end soon! Category: Coupon codes Show All Coupons. Get Offer. Fusion provides more efficient power management.
CODES 1 days ago vmware promo codes and coupons June, 5 offers validated approximately 5 months ago. Yes, email me exclusive offers and coupons. The ultimate Windows on Mac experience. Switch with ease from a PC to a Mac. Run Windows and Mac applications side-by-side.
Big Savings with VMware promo code or coupon. VMware fusion is the perfect illusion virtualization application for all Mac users. The features of this software are designed for advanced users, developer and IT admins. It is supporting the world with one of the best virtualization software. You can buy this VMware Fusion 11 Pro at very low and affordable prices.
It is ready for macOS Mojave and the latest release.
VMware Fusion Coupon Code : Offer on VMWare Fusion 12 & Pro.Up to 40% Off VMware Fusion and VMware Workstation for Education
Category: Free shipping Show All Coupons. Category: coupon codes Show All Coupons. The list gets updated daily, and almost all of them are verified and free to use. Do check back often or bookmark the page for those VMware Fusion offers: including 4 VMware Fusion promo codes and 14 ….
Category: Promo codes Show All Coupons. Free Trials. Amazing discount on VMware Software Products. You will also get a. July coupon codes end soon! Category: Coupon codes Show All Coupons. Get Offer. Fusion provides more efficient power management. CODES 1 days ago vmware promo codes and coupons June, 5 offers validated approximately 5 months ago. Yes, email me exclusive offers and coupons. The ultimate Windows on Mac experience. Switch with ease from a PC to a Mac. There are many products that can be run on windows only.
VMware Fusion made it possible to run applications on the Mac operating system through the help of virtualization. So VMware Fusion is one of the perfect software. This is the best offer available for the month of on the VMware Fusion product line up. Vmware Fusion is one of the best options when it comes to Virtualization we have more software that can do the Virtualization task like.
Parallels Desktop 11 — This one of the latest virtual software by parallels for Mac os to run Mac and Windows operating system side by side. We have left the Virtual Box from our comparison as it comes as freeware. So You can try without spending any money. It helps you to decide which one better Virtual software for you.
If we compare overall performance in terms of number and benchmark the Vmware fusion is on edge and will be a clear winner. There is a very important role to cut your price when the use of voucher code. So never forget to take benefits of this discount offers VMware fusion is the perfect illusion virtualization application for all Mac users.
This fusion is the best virtual application for home users and powerful stuff for IT professionals, developers, and businesses. Discount prices marked. Valid for students, faculty and staff. Free Trials Offer Verified! Price as marked. Limited time offer. Magasinez Nos Meilleurs Offres 1 used today. Upgrade to Fusion 12 Pro 1 used today. Save with the Current Promotions 2 used today. Shop vSphere Essentials 2 used today.
VMware Current Promotions 2 used today. VMware Free Trials 1 used today. Fusion or Fusion Pro Trial 1 used today. VMware Online Store 2 used today. Copy this code and use at checkout. Go To Store. Sale No Expires. VMware fusion …. Download a VMware Workstation 16 Pro …. If you own any previous versions you are eligible for upgrade version, which goes with a good discount.
User Rating: 5 8 votes The VMware offers a wide range of products to satisfy all the needs of its users. Now, you can achieve great discounts with Vmware. Discount Coupons and Promotional Codes, you will enjoy the maximum discount on your order. This is also the biggest daily discount of Vmware. VMware delivers variety of software and technical resources for virtual networking, virtualization management, virtual storage and virtual security.
Vmware fusion 11 pro discount code free download.Vmware Fusion 11 Coupon Code
Category: Promo codes Show All Coupons. Free Trials. Amazing discount on VMware Software Products. You will also get a. July coupon codes end soon! Category: Coupon codes Show All Coupons. Get Offer. Fusion provides more efficient power management. CODES 1 days ago vmware promo codes and coupons June, 5 offers validated approximately 5 months ago. Yes, email me exclusive offers and coupons.
The ultimate Windows on Mac experience. Switch with ease from a PC to a Mac. Run Windows and Mac applications side-by-side. Big Savings with VMware promo code or coupon.
VMware fusion is the perfect illusion virtualization application for all Mac users. The features of this software are designed for advanced users, developer and IT admins. So VMware Fusion is one of the perfect software. This is the best offer available for the month of on the VMware Fusion product line up.
Vmware Fusion is one of the best options when it comes to Virtualization we have more software that can do the Virtualization task like. Parallels Desktop 11 — This one of the latest virtual software by parallels for Mac os to run Mac and Windows operating system side by side.
We have left the Virtual Box from our comparison as it comes as freeware. So You can try without spending any money. It helps you to decide which one better Virtual software for you.
If we compare overall performance in terms of number and benchmark the Vmware fusion is on edge and will be a clear winner. There is a very important role to cut your price when the use of voucher code.
So never forget to take benefits of this discount offers VMware fusion is the perfect illusion virtualization application for all Mac users. This fusion is the best virtual application for home users and powerful stuff for IT professionals, developers, and businesses.
It simply allows all the users to virtualize a multitude of so many operating systems. It is one of the most reliable ways to run many Windows applications on a Mac. Limited time offer. Magasinez Nos Meilleurs Offres 1 used today. Upgrade to Fusion 12 Pro 1 used today. Save with the Current Promotions 2 used today. Shop vSphere Essentials 2 used today. VMware Current Promotions 2 used today.
VMware Free Trials 1 used today. Fusion or Fusion Pro Trial 1 used today. VMware Online Store 2 used today. Capterra Workstation 1 used today. VMware Store 1 used today. Europe - VMware Europe 1 used today. VMware Horizon 1 used today. VMware Fusion Pro takes virtualization on the Mac to the next level with powerful features designed for advanced users, developers and IT admins. With leading edge desktop virtualization features and added cloud capabilities. With the ability to assign 64GB of memory, 16 virtual processors and 2GB of graphics memory per virtual machine, Fusion Pro delivers leading edge features for running Windows on a Mac.
And, with innovative tools such as linked clones, virtual network editor with IPv6 support, and connectivity to. Get This Deal. Never miss a coupon! Let us notify you when fresh coupons are found. VMware fusion is the perfect ….
VMware WorkStation 16 Pro. View Offers. VMware Workstation 16 Player.
クソ旦那への逆襲 : され妻つきこブログ｜アラサーママのサレ妻経験録 Powered by ライブドアブログ.Nikon Z 14-24mm F2.8 S field review
Looking for:
Nikon capture nx2 product key generator free |
FAQ: Google Fusion Tables - Fusion Tables Help.Nikon capture nx2 product key generator free
Nikon's Nikkor Z mm F2. With a focal range of mm on full-frame bodies or mm on APS-C bodies, it's a great walkaround lens for landscapes and cityscapes alike. It's also an interesting option for astrophotographers, and performs equally well as a wide-angle video lens. All images edited in Adobe Camera Raw Sharpening and источник reduction at defaults. Handling Autofocus and focus breathing Image quality Conclusion Samples.
Although it has no direct rivals on the Nikon Z-mount, the Z mm F2. But it's a worthwhile 10mm 0. And that's despite it actually having a more complex optical formula and added filter support.
Plus if one were to consider the AF-S mm F2. That would add another 31mm 1. As for nikon capture nx2 product key generator free mirrorless equivalents on other mounts, there's no close alternative on Canon's RF-mount, the nearest equivalent being the longer-ranging, less-wide RF mm F2. The nearest match is the Sigma mm F2. The Sigma is a much more affordable lens, costing a bit less than two-thirds as much as the Nikon Z mm F2.
For that, the Sigma gets you an even more complex optical formula and two extra aperture blades, for a total of And while the Sigma doesn't accept front-mounted filters as can the Nikon courtesy of one of its included lens hoodsit will fit gel filters in a holder at the rear of the lens.
It does have an extremely swift linear autofocus drive with a total of four motors, unlike the stepper motor drive of the Nikkor Z mm F2. But as we'll see, the Nikon is no slouch in the Nikon capture nx2 product key generator free department either. Although it's very compact for what it is — and Nikon is certainly correct in calling it both the world's shortest and lightest full-frame F2.
At around And it's certainly very well-built, with a solid, quality feel despite a predominantly plastic external shell. It balances pretty well on Nikon's latest full-frame bodies, with just a touch of 'front-heavy' feel that doesn't really change as you zoom the lens. As well as a focus ring at the front of the barrel and a zoom ring directly behind it, взято отсюда mm F2.
This can be used to control the lens' aperture, ISO sensitivity or exposure compensation though it lacks detents, which some users find helpful when manipulating these types of settings. All three rings turn smoothly, with both the manual focus ring and control ring being nicely dampened.
In between the zoom and control rings you'll find a small information display and two buttons. The L-Fn button on the left quadrant of the barrel is another configurable control which can be set through the camera's menu system to options including autofocus lock, subject tracking, image playback and more. The Display button, which is closer to the OLED panel itself, cycles through three different display modes: focal length to the nearest 0.
The aperture value is only shown in aperture-priority or manual modes, and in these modes the focus display also gains a depth-of-field indicator beneath the distance scale.
Finally, of the left side of the mm F2. The lens is fully sealed against dust and moisture, with seals not only at the base, but also at its control rings, buttons and focus mode switch, as well as at joins between components.
There's nikon capture nx2 product key generator free optical image stabilization on this lens, but that's par for the course in wide-angle lenses. Most Z-mount cameras offer in-body image stabilization anyway, and blur from camera shake is typically less of a concern for wide-angle photography in the first place. The front lens element is fluorine-coated to resist fingerprints and smudges. It's also flat, which is a major contrast to the large, bulging front elements of the earlier DSLR lens and most similar optics.
While you nikon capture nx2 product key generator free attach filters directly to the front of the lens, two removable hoods are included and one of these does feature filter threads. The HB lens hood is the smaller and lighter of the pair, and is compatible with the standard lens cap. The HB lens hood is much жмите, especially if you're using its huge lens cap, but it does accept mm screw-on filters.
If you don't need quick access to the filter or the ability to rotate it, you can potentially save money by instead using trimmable drop-in gel filters that slip into the rear of the lens prior to mounting.
Unlike some rivals, Nikon doesn't include a filter template, but dimensions are shown in the product manual. Basically, it's a 38 x 30mm filter with a 5 x 5mm triangle cut off all four corners. Nikon has based the autofocus system for its Nikkor Посетить страницу mm F2.
Typically, that's a choice which translates to smooth, quiet but less-than-swift autofocus. The great news is that this isn't true here. Despite the use of a stepper motor, we were surprised to find its AF to be nikon capture nx2 product key generator free just very smooth and completely silent, but also very fast. We measured the full-rack autofocus time at roughly half a second. The mm isn't a macro lens, but with a minimum focusing distance of 0.
That maximum magnification of 0. Videographers will be thrilled to hear that Nikon has done a great job of controlling focus breathing, just as it did in the other members of its Z-mount F2. For users of manual focus, you can choose your desired direction nikon capture nx2 product key generator free rotation for the focus ring, and the ring's dampening makes it easy to make smooth adjustments. Unfortunately, though, the current crop of Nikon Z-mount bodies doesn't allow you to switch from speed-sensitive response to linear response for the focus ring, meaning it's going to be difficult to make repeated manual focus pulls with precision.
Given its price premium over the earlier DSLR-oriented design, you'll likely expect great things from Nikon's mm F2. It can deliver tack-sharp images across its zoom range, and the only slight weak spot is a tendency towards overly-busy bokeh. At the wide-angle end of the zoom range, center sharpness is already excellent even with the F2. Unfortunately, this sharpness drops off dramatically as you approach the edges, such that even areas of the image just a third of the way from the center to the edge are noticeably soft.
The extreme edges and corners are noticeably soft wide-open, but focusing in the corners sharpens them right back up, indicating a degree of field curvature visible in nikon capture nx2 product key generator free grass, here. Fortunately, stopping down to F5. Zooming in to 24mm, center sharpness is also excellent wide-open at F2. The extreme corners are a little soft, albeit less so than they were wide-open at 14mm, but again, both focusing in the corners and stopping down to F5.
Overall, the Nikkor Z mm F2. We'd happily shoot single subjects wide-open at F2. In a lens landscape recently filled with lenses that are tack sharp wide open and often across more of the frame, this is perhaps a bit disappointing. In most respects, bokeh is quite pleasing too, but if we had to pick a weak spot this would nevertheless be nikon capture nx2 product key generator free.
Specular highlights are very clean with no onion ring, only minimal cat's eye effect in the extreme corners, and a nice, round adobe acrobat x pro compatible office 2013 free download even as you stop down somewhat.
Unfortunately, they also have a noticeably brighter outline or soap bubble effect which can make the bokeh very busy-looking. And we also noticed that while the transition from out нажмите чтобы увидеть больше focus to sharp and back again is quite pleasing, in areas that are only slightly out of focus the transition can give the appearance of a double image that almost looks like motion blur, as you'll notice in the nikon capture nx2 product key generator free in this image.
This is often referred to as 'Nisen bokeh', and while it does largely go away as you stop down a little, it's something to watch out for regardless. We've seen it increasingly in fast, wide lenses, and it looks like this Nikon isn't immune to it either. As we mentioned in the handling section, the mm F2. It also handles bright light sources that make it to the front lens element very well. Flare is controlled nicely, with no ghosting or reflections and not much loss of contrast either.
It also gives reasonably nice pointed nikon capture nx2 product key generator freethanks to its nine-bladed iris. They're a bit less crisp than those of some rival lenses, but the spikes are fairly even in length even if they diffuse fairly quickly.
Fans of the DSLR version of this ссылка на страницу will feel right at home with the similar rendering. And as for longitudinal chromatic aberration LoCAwhich causes color fringing in the foreground and nikon capture nx2 product key generator free and can be hard to correct post-capture, this lens handles it beautifully.
Overall, a very impressive result in terms of aberrations! The Nikon Z mm F2. Alongside the Nikkor Z mm F2. Like those earlier lenses, the mm F2. It represents a noticeable step beyond its DSLR-oriented predecessor in terms of sharpness and yet is far lighter and noticeably more compact.
There are some flies in the ointment этом buy windows 10 enterprise activation key free download сообщение. While central and peak sharpness at your point of focus are both very good wide open, nikon capture nx2 product key generator free the frame consistency is lacking.
Stopping down to F5. Furthermore, bokeh can at times appear busy due to double-edged bokeh nikon capture nx2 product key generator free transition zones and bright edges on specular highlights think out-of-focus holiday lights that gives specular highlights a 'soap bubble' effect.
It's not just a stills lens, either. It's equally well-suited to video capture, making it quite a versatile pick. And we appreciated its handy LCD info display, which makes it easy to confirm your precise focal length or focus distance, and even to judge depth of field. Pro x reddit crack also very solidly built, comprehensively weather-sealed and gives you a choice of either screw-in front filters or gel filters at the rear. Nikon capture nx2 product key generator free, you'll want to stick to the latter whenever possible as its mm screw-in filters will be both expensive and tricky to find, but rivals lack this option altogether.
And speaking of rivals, we love Canon's lineup but with the arrival of this lens, we think Nikon's Z-mount lineup is now just a little more consistent. And while it's not a huge difference, there's no denying that the Nikon mm is both shorter and lighter than its nearest rival on another platform, the Sigma mm F2.
As for the Z-mount specifically, there's realistically no alternative to this lens, short of using a DSLR lens with the FTZ mount adapter -- and that won't be remotely as satisfying an experience, with lesser image quality, its own complex field curvature issues, and much more bulk, even if you'll save a little in terms of the cost.
For a lens of this type, it's relatively small and light, very practical, and really makes the most of the short flange-back distance of mirrorless cameras in general, and the Z-mount specifically! This is a relatively aberration free lens, and many will either easily work around, or forgive, its shortcomings around across-the-frame consistency and bokeh.
And when you do, there's a lot to like about the images it's capable nikon capture nx2 product key generator free. Please do not reproduce any of these images without prior permission see our copyright page. However, maybe the lens performs differently at infinity focus?? This is a prime lens, and nikon capture nx2 product key generator free the new standard, for astro-landscape photographers. Not testing for coma is a big oversight.
Nikon capture nx2 product key generator free
They mostly care about what helps them make more money faster, easier and with as little investment as possible. When I need a new car I don't ask taxi drivers for an advice.
About my tone. Tiny little Instagram snapshots do not require expensive camera gear. And I don't care if you like it or not. That's the truth. The Internet is flooded with too much idiocy for us to be polite about every silly idea in every head. If I'm wrong bout something, please, don't waste time on politeness and just tell me what I'm missing. Thank you. Got Z 2. Even the a7SIII. Sigma lenses are not lasting more than year and a half if used by pro photographers.
Some clients are selling their R5 due to overheating problems as hibrid shooters. Nikon Z by now is the system that gets the job done in any condition and heading. Now with the Z9 ariseing, even more. I have the new Z F4 and it is very sharp. I do not see anything in the sample photos i could not get the same results with the F4 version except the little bit of extra background blur at times. I also have the Tamron 2. Both Nikon wide lens are over priced I am keeping my F4 but it is no better then my Tamron that cost half as much in any way at all.
Nikon look to have the nicest cameras with the bulkiest weird set of lenses.. Savviest I put up with a Canon mm collapsing lens on a M6ii because the results are so good but I wish the lens was just bigger and fixed. Puts me off a lens it really does. I coon. Or a Leica SL with a sigma art lens.
I coon oh good grief you're not understanding, by collapsing I mean a lens where you have to twist it to a given position BEFORE you can use it and the camera will recognise it, then collapse it back to the original position after you have used it. I hate that, its two extra stages to your photography and makes the lens more fragile as well as slowing you down. You've just referred to a 'tromboning' lens, im not bothered about that. Hi res cameras frequently need primes now over zooms and especially so with mp ff sensors coming.
I dont think any can son nik zooms currently available will cope. Only fujifilm seem to pull it off their gfx zooms seem as good as primes in use. Well they do! The only outstanding nikon ive used recently was the mm, I float between all the systems and havent gone for nikon because I find their lens offering the least appealing. Do what you want its your money. Fuji GFX and Leica are better for me at the moment. I agree about not seeing it in the viewfinder.
I use it as a reference all the time on my Olympus cameras. Very useful. I own Nikon cameras and lenses albeit all film-based and appreciated the detailed descriptions and supporting sample photos. I have used DPreview to help me decide on camera purchases, and enjoy the way that the reviewers speak to both enthusiasts and pros. Well done. AND i can now use them on all 3 of the trinity 2.
Now THAT is a nifty feature …. This is what happens when a phone advertising site reviews a proper lens Following your pro suggestions, I've just bought a fish eye lens for face portrait of models ;. When they say "Wide open sharpness drops off quickly as you move away from image center" samples provided by CameraLabs demonstrate quite the opposite; sharpness in the edge remains very good at 2.
Maybe is it not completely the case at short distance still remains very good , but who is going to take pictures with a UWA at 2. This is one of my main criticism reagarding this review : they do not consider real life scenarios which should be the basis of any review. At least you CAN mount them. I feel like this review harped on things that are trivial when it comes to an ultra wide angle zoom.
And if this is used for portraiture, the model is not going to be in the corners unless the photographer for some strange reason wants the model to appear distorted.
Who really uses an ultra wide zoom for bokeh shots? Ultra wide zooms are typically for environmental portraiture where you want both the model and background in focus.
And there are plenty of 3rd party filters out there at a reasonable cost. Would it be better for a reviewer - whose job is to be critical - to not mention shortcomings that may be deal-breakers for a few people? If these things don't bother you personally it's your job as a consumer of the review to ignore them as irrelevancies.
Reviewers should be critical of things that actually matter and relate to what the lens was designed for. This reviewer didn't do that. Instead he was critical about things that the lens wasn't desgined with in mind.
All of those criticisms would be as trivial and stupid as this reviewer's criticisms of the mm. Who are you to judge what matters to all other photographers? Even if they didn't it should still be mentioned, as long as the product is fairly compared with its peers.
It's a reviewer's job to describe the characteristics of a product without prejudice and let the reader decide whether the description is of a product that suits their own needs. The only thing I tend to agree with is the point about filters, and given the findings of other reviews regarding edge sharpness it does sound like the softness this reviewer found is mostly limited to relatively close subjects, and if that is the case then they should have spotted that and mentioned it.
Too aggressive and busy bokeh. Nice lens in many other regards. Could have had better edge sharpness at lager apertures, but not important for all. Posting a review during Mercury Retrograde be like auto-correct changes your Gold to Silver.
Internet will always disagree anyway, no matter planets or Moon phase. Looks like a gold for landscape and bronze for portraiture so a silver overall sounds about right. Heck I use my teles as much as the UWA for landscapes tbh, these strict use case labels are pretty useless. So many sore Nikon fan boys in the comments. If the Z is good for your Nikon Z cameras and the way you shoot then buy it and be happy.
But its a fact when comparring with other brands wide angle zooms that there are lighter, more appealing IQ for certain scenarious, wider angle, less costly lenses available. Track79 - They have already been listed in your previous thread further down, but I can copy paste some examples. Tamron is the lightest F2. Sony GM is the widest F2. Track79 - its up to you if questionable bokeh meats your criteria, but wider lens range doesn't.
If you are happy with this lens then thats great. A review however is better to cover broader use of the lens. Comparing the Sigma to the Nikon, they say that "differences in optical performance become minimal and both lenses are mostly neck-and-neck".
Comparing the Sigma to the Sony, they conclude that the Sigma is "optically comparable to and in the FF-corner even sharper than the Sony FE mm f2.
Given those two statements, the logical conclusion is that the Nikon and Sony are also optically comparable, with the Nikon maybe having an edge in the FF corner.
Shame because the Z9 looks great. Quality wise you are getting things wrong. The best Sony are only barely as good as the corresponding Z lenses and in most cases the Nikon is ahead.
There may be a few sore Nikon users here focusing on the review's negatives rather than the overall praise the lens got, but there aren't really many lighter UWA options at all, at least not if you want an f2.
In fact there's only a single f2. All other f2. I don't think bokeh and rendering are a strength of any UWA so I'm curious what lighter UWA zoom you think is more pleasing for certain uses If I really cared about that when shooting this wide I'd grab a prime, but even then there's no guarantees. The Z is pretty darn light for this class of lens, if anything I think the biggest misstep in the review is not the Con list it is what it is, and the award thing is meaningless imo but that they kinda minimized the weight difference between this and the Sigma f2.
Photography you've got me wondering if I'm in a parallel universe, with the exception of the , canon L lenses are superb, sony primes are the best full frame lenses you could wish for, im only moving out of the system as I cant stand the cameras, all my GFX optics are stellar, I worry I could cut my eyes peeping the files the images are so sharp, and whole I think nikon cameras are a delight, the primes seem to have been designed by a five years, old, long, bulky, primative, compare their fast 50 against the 50 gm prime, is it some kind if joke offering by nikon?
I detest folding lenses like the f4, really horrible to use. Heh, so many of these things are so subjective, I like that several of Sony's primes are significantly smaller and often faster AF'ing without optical compromise beyond maybe some focus breathing They're the smallest f4 zooms of their kind out there, there's some value in that.
The G looks great but it's overkill for me and it misses out on filters, so despite the bevy of UWA options on Sony I can see why some would still favor Nikon's or Canon's. Impulses that's a valid opinion, but having just left GM primes and looking at nikons lens offerings I can't buy in their system which is really sad, and I've rows of motordriven F2 cameras, F3 F4 F5, FM2T D2x looking at me from the old days on my office shelves..
Raindrop I can see the s is superb, but where are the 1. Anything near seems ugly and from a previous generation. Why are all the primes so physically long? Haven't they the design ability or do they just not care? None of its made in Japan now. All off-putting on someone eyeing the Z9.
At this time only Sony has many 1. Of course as time passes things will even out. Besides the Z 50 1. Yeah you can get a tiny 50 1. The 50 1. I said least compromises. Good thing is the buyer has the choice and freedom to pick whatever is of value the most.
They must have reviewed a different lens from the ones raved about here in the forums on DPR. I'm sure there'll be a revised review. Do me a favor! CN too glib by half. Plus the DPR "sharpness disease" strikes again. It's a fine lens and an obvious choice for a Z mount owner.
However I can say with absolute confidence my Sigma f2. But if I owned a Z mount their lens would probably be a sound choice. I don't use filters so that isn't a argue point for me anyway. But for sharpness corner to corner, lack of distortion, no CA and superb bokeh it's hard to argue in favor of the Nikon.
But heck they had to come up with something for their Z folks. Not only does it instantly and accurately focus even with eye detection it is known that Sigma nailed the algorithm on the R5 for focus but it has displayed no bad habits whatsoever. A rarity for a 3rd party lens indeed. It sends Canon's own RF lens packing as well having worked with one. Sometimes there are rare exceptions to every rule.
In this case this is one of them. The other is Sigma's f1. It's right there with the absurdly expensive RF85mm f1. I understand your sentiment believe me. I was a Nikonian from till with many of their pro bodies and lenses. I left Canon after the 1D when Nikon stepped ahead of them. But alas it went the other direction with the advent of the R5. I get paid for some of my work so I decided to make the investment of 4 of their top RF glass and haven't regretted it.
But I get it, the stuff is big bucks now. That kind of hyperbole undermines your credibility. I'm NOT exaggerating. Just try one and you'll be singing my praises instead of tearing me down.
I wouldn't joke like so many others apparently about this. ProDude Wrong, wrong and very wrong. Every credible test has shown the Z to have no peers. The fact that they did not shoot it against any of the competitors goes to show that this test is suspect at best and the laziest review I have seen in quite some time. Not good for portraits, filters are expensive. In fact at least the conclusion from Chris is correct, where he states that the Nikon Z trinity is better than Canons offerings that includes the Z The Sigma is a good lens, but is no match for the Z when compared side by side.
On Cameralabs you can compare corner sharpness of the Nikon Z 2. When focused at infinity the Nikon is significantly sharper in the corners, and is half the weight. The MTF curves confirm this performance delta. Also Christopher Frost confirms that the mirrorless Sigma lens is just as good as Nikon lens.
Considering the price differences, mirrorless Sigma does run rings around the Nikon. But the guy "ProDude" is confusing the two Sigma lenses above. If one doesn't use filters often, Sigma is a better choice. But if one constantly use filters, Nikon is apparently the better one. If anything, overall they're quite similar in price.
Just depends on which particular lens you want. It's not as if one brand is going to save you tons more money. The sigma mirrorless version is one of the greatest price v performance lenses in photography.
The close-up test was even more favorable for the sigma at 24mm image edge but again was back and forth. Hobbyist landscape shooters should seriously consider adapting the Sigma DN version and saving some coin.
Just be aware that weather sealing may be compromised. I am always amused when people, with no practical experience with any given product, speak with confidence about said product. You don't own Nikon. You don't own this lens. Haven't even tried it in a store. Yet you can assure us your choice in lens runs rings the Nikon. Except it can't take filters, work on a Z, has more focus breathing, and as an owner of the lens, I can assure you it's plenty sharp.
Nikon had a 2. The F mount is a legend. And this surpasses it in every way. Camera Labs compared the Sigma to the Nikon. Their conclusion was that "differences in optical performance become minimal and both lenses are mostly neck-and-neck".
The Sigma did have slightly better bokeh while the Nikon's coatings gave it an edge when shooting against harsh light. You can make some arguments about uncompromised optical designs, software corrections and yadda yadda with a prime or other FLs, but the mirrorless flange distance for UWAs is just a massive advantage and it's proven itself pretty clearly across a variety of options now. Other than saving yourself the cost of a new lens, there's 0 reason to adapt a DSLR UWA zoom on mirrorless save for maybe the Canon , and that would still be about cost and available options more than optics.
This lens has one major downside - it's really expensive. Otherwise it's excellent, at least for what I do landscapes, so yeah, I don't worry about its allegedly substandard portrait abilities. Also "sharpness dropping off dramatically a third-way towards the edge" is not something I would have associated with this lens.
Yes, it is true that with the exception of third-party and legacy mount lenses, the fast ultra-wide zoom arena is populated by rather expensive options. I use it for architecture stopped down and for wedding journalism style photos. It's great as a people lens and not one dimensional as the review suggests. I didn't choose this lens for bokeh.
Quite frankly, who chooses 14mm for bokeh? I have other lenses for that. This lens is to get everything, dramatically, in the frame. It's a beauty lens. Incredibly enough that was supposedly a mistake… their harsh comments were supposed to be directed against the 35mm f1. Which is nearly as undeserved. But I have to agree. It really does feel like there is willingness to take momentum away from Nikon.
Shines at 2. Where was that? They literally called it a new generation of optics. I think I found some evidence of what you're alluding to link below , my original guess was right that it was a DPRTV comment It seems pretty unfair to hold ALL the editors in judgement over the mistake of one years ago, specially when the lens in question was actually praised over and over. That DPRTV list must've not stuck with me as much as the other articles I do remember reading, might be time for some to let it go.
The website linked hasn't tested the Canon RF mm 2. This reads more like a Nikon Enthusiasts site than a real review site. None of the reviews I've read show the actual non software corrected vignetting levels as well, which is important since a software boost of brightness in certain areas of the image would normally produce higher noise levels in those areas in low light high ISO situations.
No mention whatsoever of the Z F4 - which in reality is its biggest rival given that the F2. Check some real world comparisons fe. The bokeh on the samples looks also quite good. And please show me a 14mm UWA that doesn't show "nervous" bokeh at transition zone. The 2. In fact it's hard to fault the F4 versions that Nikon have produced. The replies to the review here are pretty much unanimous in the opinion that the review was a dud not the lens , maybe they should get someone who knows how to use an ultrawide next time?
Reading all the comments was joyful confirmation of my initial perception of this article having been written with a scripted agenda As a nightscape photographer, I have to flat-out disagree with the "findings" of wide-open sharpness falling off so quickly.
In the linked sample image, it seems very clear to me that the test image has fallen to one of the classic blunders: DOF is much deeper dead-center than it is off-center, and if you set focus for somewhere around the rule-of-thirds area instead, you consistently get much better results across the entire field.
Also, flat-out, that relatively close-up test image is not as useful for wide-open sharpness testing, period. Because while a portrait or journalistic photographer can simply move their focus point off-center and get very sharp results, a nightscape photographer is, of course, focusing at infinity.
And in my extensive testing, the plane of focus is quite flat, and the off-center and even extreme corner sharpness is quite impressive. I'll say this very plainly: when focused on stars at a rule-of-thirds point, you can expect nearly pin-point perfect stars across the entire image, with minimal coma or loss of overall sharpness in the extreme corners.
I honestly believe this lens is incredible, even among the incredible Sigma mm 2. But it's WAY better than that one test sample. I agree with your assessment. The Z 14—24 is a lens that rewards more careful use, something that is common with ultrawide glass.
Shooting with a fast ultrawide lens in the same manner as one would a cell phone, then basing a large part of a review on the results, is disappointing for a site like DPR that should know better and has the resources to do better. I've learned not to take DPR's sharpness assessments too seriously.
The evidence of their own gallery shots is often enough to disprove what they say in the review. I am always interested in the DP reviews, but don't fully agree with the review. I know that samples can sometimes vary, but as far as my eyes can tell without pixel peeping sharpness across the range wide open is near perfect. But I would imagine this could be subjective, but it is the best lens I have ever used for weight and performance.
Also very strange to critique it for being able to take screw in filters. Next we will see DPR critiquing water for being wet or fire for being hot. If you're looking at the sample image they linked, sharpness across the range wide-open is NOT perfect, at all. However, I believe that to be because of a little-known aspect of how DOF behaves on ultra-wide lenses. That is, dead-center focus is simply not the best way to test an ultra-wide optical formula for off-center sharpness at relatively close range.
Really I never would have guessed a dedicated UWA doesn't excel at something it wasn't designed for. Nothing else in it's class even offers the option of front filter threads - that should be a "pro". Seems like DPR was just making up cons for the sake of it. Not every lens or camera body is great or the best. I find DPR more credible when not everything gets a perfect review.
Still enjoy DPR as a resource but mostly for that found in it's forums. I pay little heed to their percentages or conclusions. Mike T! Seeing DPR readers fight over a Gold or Silver award, as if they were a bunch of 8-year olds, is pretty funny. Having said that, to be quite honest, I bet Sony made the more popular, trendy decision. This is partly sarcasm, BTW! Either way, here's the thing: With Nikon Z, you can "just" put an E-mount lens on an adapter. The AF might not be excellent for a journalist, but for a nightscape or landscape photographer, it's fine.
Sony will have more and more options, though, from Tamron, Sigma, and Roki-Yang, before any third-parties arrive to Z. Me as well I actually like them all! Too many amazing choices now. Available on Z, E, and RF mounts. Just seems weird. However, the central sharpness is good enough that it does make a fantastic alternative for anyone who likes filters and is either shooting stopped down, or just not inspecting their corners too closely.
The wild card with the DSLR version always has been field curvature. If you don't run afoul of that, then great, so yay astro but watch yourself close up. I'm assuming this one has much less of it, but the review doesn't seem to mention this explicitly despite hinting at it. I still don't find this a hugely useful FL. I'd prefer a of more conventional size that reaches long enough to be able to skip a if need be and can share filters with other related products -- in this case, I suppose 82mm seeing as that's what's on the f2.
And because wide-angle is like a drug, the Venus Laowa 12mm F2. I also remember people who changed to Nikon because of the original I did extensive testing for my own review.
No thanks. Nikon created something truly innovative and stellar. Close-up field curvature seems quite severe, and maybe bokeh isn't what this lens is optimized for, but other than that, it is an impressive optical accomplishment, and a flagship beast at a price tag far under the competition.
No it doesnt. This Nikon matches the Sony at all comparable focal lengths, which counts as "shining" considering its price and compactness. I see xx, xx, and xx lenses as entirely different choices with their own sets of trade-offs and advantages.
I'd maybe lump xx in with xx and xx in with xx So is it a sharpness issue wide open or field curvature? There are ways to combat field curvature. I was thinking about adding this lens after the RF disappointed. That and I had to go through three copies to get decent sharpness on all four corners.
For the price, I expected more. I heard same thing about 3 copies and de-centring on from one landscape photographer in Germany :. So far all my Z lenses where great strait out of the box: though I don't know about Z 2. If you're focusing close-up, you can expect field curvature, but if your subject isn't a brick wall, you can still get impressive sharpness by simply focusing correctly on your subject, wherever it is in the frame.
If you're doing nightscape photography, you can expect far LESS field curvature than the linked example image, when focused correctly. There's no report yet on natural non software corrected levels of vignetting yet. Mirrorless cameras make some optical problems easier to solve, but introduce others, such as higher levels of vignetting.
Sample variation occurs with all brands. LensRentals Blog discusses this extensively. My first mm f2. My second copy was good. I've owned both Nikon and Canon systems for years I always test every lens I've bought for both systems, and have had to return some with issues from both manufacturers. Your mileage may vary The larger mounts that nikon and canon are currently using allow for more optical design options, and make certain challenges easier.
That's all. It doesn't mean that everything is better "just because". These are new mounts, so I'm sure the best is yet to come. Currently, sony's e mount is now the most limited mount - doesn't mean they can't do good lenses, they can, but is more difficult and they will not have as many options for it. Wide lenses are often used in weddings where people are in a small room setting , getting make up for example, certainly a number of set ups in event photography. This is 2. Reviewer is right to call it out if they didn't it for sure would be in the comments.
GonOS No. I have no such examples but its not comparative review. Check out the video review and the YT review of Christopher Frost, they pick out same issues, However come across far for appreciative glowing even of the overall performance. And if you are just a little bit aware about optical and lens tech, such "problems" aren't even on the table of question as you are aware it is a dumb desire.
But nowadays, we have loud experts of final result that have zero knowledge how the technology manage to get that result, but the same genius reviewers have super overly confident feelings how it could be better with zero knowledge to design it, but a never ending capacity to whine about the non achievement of their crazy whishes by tech manufacturer.
Funniest part is that when Nikon release a lens with OOF and creamy result in target, the same reviewers whine that lens does present other caveats It is really well known optic is absolutly not a balance problem at all. Why isn't anyone mentioning that you can buy a dedicated filter holder for this lens from NiSi and a couple of other manufacturers now that allows the use of standard mm filters?
This negates any dicussions on big new filters, just use the ones you own. This is an enormous plus for this lens. Boss, help me — what I need to do? Only Nikkor! What is that? Only Nikkor S. What is Nikkor S? We have no Nikkor cameras nowhere. How we can test it?
Just give him the highest mark we can, it sounds like a great product. And text will be written by random numbers generator. Maximum is Silver. Man, I always hear people complain about Sony fanboys, but lately it's been the Nikon crowd that is all riled up. Yes, they put filter SIZE as a negative, but they also put filters in the positive. No, the bokeh isn't perfect, and they showed sample images to back it up.
And honestly you think review sites should test multiple copies for every review? Do you realize how much time that would take? And where would they procure all these lenses from? Copy variation is inherently part of ownership of a lens, if some lenses are less sharp than others, that's still good to know for a prospective customer.
And no, the Z7 II did not deserve a gold award. Good ergonomics and ISO 64 iq is not enough for gold. DPR has rated Nikon's products highly with gold in the past.
Stop acting like there is bias just cause your product didn't "win" gold. Agreed, the critique of the critique is of a low standard, and more worthy of cult followers than even Brand fanboys.
Reviewer said what they found and backed it up with evidence. I have to say that I am impressed. I didn't think someone would use this review to write more criticism of Nikon Z's AF I guess that the arrival of the Z9 must generate a lot of stress in some people If you see the other top comments, some people were talking about DPR's supposed bias against Nikon, saying the Z7 II deserved gold along with this lens. That is why I bring it up, so you should be more impressed that people used the lens review to write even more defense of the Z7 II, despite most people saying it's a great camera but people want to indefinitely freak out about one or two negative YouTube videos and act like the whole world is trashing Nikon.
That you mention the Z9 only shows that you too look forward to improved AF from what Nikon currently offers. And no, I'm not stressed about it. Actually I am excited about it since I am hoping to change systems soon and Nikon is in my top two picks. This has nothing to do with fanboyism. I just think it's weird to blame this lens for the existence of physics.
The fact of the matter is that the only valid criticisms for the Z mm are the resolution drop off towards the edges, and the price hike although most of its competitors are very similar in price. The rest is greedy nitpicking at best, unreasonable wishful thinking at worst.
It reeks of a lack of realism and professionalism. It wasn't one fool I picked, it was many fools who upvoted the comment to the most popular tab, so go after them, not me. I was only responding to a conversation they already started, much like you did when you decided to bring up the Z9 to my comment :.
It makes no sense. Lucky it even got a silver award! I tried it for bird photography and the subjects were so small in the frame I could barely see them.
Also took a photo the moon at 14mm and it was tiny! And what about those cheeky Nikon engineers providing that special lens hood for filters. I much preferred the old design where you couldn't fit them so spent less money. Also, I put it at 14mm and stood 12" away from my model to do a portrait, and her nose was like 17" long! PS the sample images were obviously taken with a cell phone. I swear to God this site isn't even trying anymore.
But then again, nobody is. Y'all use for bokeh and portraits I personally use the mm 5. Gotta love that beautiful distortion, which woman doesn't love a nose that appears to be three times it's actual size. Terrible review.
One of the worst I've seen. No comparison photos to the other lenses. Just vague assertions. Learn about its design, performance and how it handles the bamboo wall of doom in this episode of DPReview TV.
Chris and Jordan just reviewed the Nikkor Z mm F2. Check out this gallery to see full resolution sample images from their review. This year, despite the disruption, plenty of amazing cameras, lenses, accessories and other products came through our doors. Now, as the year winds down, we're highlighting some of our standout products of the year. Check out the winners of the DPReview Awards! Nikon's mirrorless lens roadmap just moved two steps further forward with the launch of the new mm F2.
Read on to learn more about these two premium Z-mount lenses. Sony has just released a trio of impressively small, light, ultrawide lenses for APS-C. These lenses are designed for vloggers, so Chris decided to film himself and find out how they perform. Holy moly, this thing is tiny! We take the adorable Sigma mm F2. Check some real world comparisons fe. The bokeh on the samples looks also quite good. And please show me a 14mm UWA that doesn't show "nervous" bokeh at transition zone.
The 2. In fact it's hard to fault the F4 versions that Nikon have produced. The replies to the review here are pretty much unanimous in the opinion that the review was a dud not the lens , maybe they should get someone who knows how to use an ultrawide next time?
Reading all the comments was joyful confirmation of my initial perception of this article having been written with a scripted agenda As a nightscape photographer, I have to flat-out disagree with the "findings" of wide-open sharpness falling off so quickly.
In the linked sample image, it seems very clear to me that the test image has fallen to one of the classic blunders: DOF is much deeper dead-center than it is off-center, and if you set focus for somewhere around the rule-of-thirds area instead, you consistently get much better results across the entire field.
Also, flat-out, that relatively close-up test image is not as useful for wide-open sharpness testing, period. Because while a portrait or journalistic photographer can simply move their focus point off-center and get very sharp results, a nightscape photographer is, of course, focusing at infinity. And in my extensive testing, the plane of focus is quite flat, and the off-center and even extreme corner sharpness is quite impressive.
I'll say this very plainly: when focused on stars at a rule-of-thirds point, you can expect nearly pin-point perfect stars across the entire image, with minimal coma or loss of overall sharpness in the extreme corners. I honestly believe this lens is incredible, even among the incredible Sigma mm 2. But it's WAY better than that one test sample.
I agree with your assessment. The Z 14—24 is a lens that rewards more careful use, something that is common with ultrawide glass. Shooting with a fast ultrawide lens in the same manner as one would a cell phone, then basing a large part of a review on the results, is disappointing for a site like DPR that should know better and has the resources to do better.
I've learned not to take DPR's sharpness assessments too seriously. The evidence of their own gallery shots is often enough to disprove what they say in the review. I am always interested in the DP reviews, but don't fully agree with the review. I know that samples can sometimes vary, but as far as my eyes can tell without pixel peeping sharpness across the range wide open is near perfect. But I would imagine this could be subjective, but it is the best lens I have ever used for weight and performance.
Also very strange to critique it for being able to take screw in filters. Next we will see DPR critiquing water for being wet or fire for being hot. If you're looking at the sample image they linked, sharpness across the range wide-open is NOT perfect, at all. However, I believe that to be because of a little-known aspect of how DOF behaves on ultra-wide lenses.
That is, dead-center focus is simply not the best way to test an ultra-wide optical formula for off-center sharpness at relatively close range. Really I never would have guessed a dedicated UWA doesn't excel at something it wasn't designed for. Nothing else in it's class even offers the option of front filter threads - that should be a "pro". Seems like DPR was just making up cons for the sake of it.
Not every lens or camera body is great or the best. I find DPR more credible when not everything gets a perfect review. Still enjoy DPR as a resource but mostly for that found in it's forums. I pay little heed to their percentages or conclusions. Mike T! Seeing DPR readers fight over a Gold or Silver award, as if they were a bunch of 8-year olds, is pretty funny. Having said that, to be quite honest, I bet Sony made the more popular, trendy decision. This is partly sarcasm, BTW!
Either way, here's the thing: With Nikon Z, you can "just" put an E-mount lens on an adapter. The AF might not be excellent for a journalist, but for a nightscape or landscape photographer, it's fine. Sony will have more and more options, though, from Tamron, Sigma, and Roki-Yang, before any third-parties arrive to Z. Me as well I actually like them all! Too many amazing choices now. Available on Z, E, and RF mounts. Just seems weird.
However, the central sharpness is good enough that it does make a fantastic alternative for anyone who likes filters and is either shooting stopped down, or just not inspecting their corners too closely. The wild card with the DSLR version always has been field curvature. If you don't run afoul of that, then great, so yay astro but watch yourself close up. I'm assuming this one has much less of it, but the review doesn't seem to mention this explicitly despite hinting at it.
I still don't find this a hugely useful FL. I'd prefer a of more conventional size that reaches long enough to be able to skip a if need be and can share filters with other related products -- in this case, I suppose 82mm seeing as that's what's on the f2. And because wide-angle is like a drug, the Venus Laowa 12mm F2. I also remember people who changed to Nikon because of the original I did extensive testing for my own review. No thanks. Nikon created something truly innovative and stellar.
Close-up field curvature seems quite severe, and maybe bokeh isn't what this lens is optimized for, but other than that, it is an impressive optical accomplishment, and a flagship beast at a price tag far under the competition.
No it doesnt. This Nikon matches the Sony at all comparable focal lengths, which counts as "shining" considering its price and compactness.
I see xx, xx, and xx lenses as entirely different choices with their own sets of trade-offs and advantages. I'd maybe lump xx in with xx and xx in with xx So is it a sharpness issue wide open or field curvature?
There are ways to combat field curvature. I was thinking about adding this lens after the RF disappointed. That and I had to go through three copies to get decent sharpness on all four corners. For the price, I expected more.
I heard same thing about 3 copies and de-centring on from one landscape photographer in Germany :. So far all my Z lenses where great strait out of the box: though I don't know about Z 2. If you're focusing close-up, you can expect field curvature, but if your subject isn't a brick wall, you can still get impressive sharpness by simply focusing correctly on your subject, wherever it is in the frame.
If you're doing nightscape photography, you can expect far LESS field curvature than the linked example image, when focused correctly. There's no report yet on natural non software corrected levels of vignetting yet. Mirrorless cameras make some optical problems easier to solve, but introduce others, such as higher levels of vignetting.
Sample variation occurs with all brands. LensRentals Blog discusses this extensively. My first mm f2. My second copy was good. I've owned both Nikon and Canon systems for years I always test every lens I've bought for both systems, and have had to return some with issues from both manufacturers. Your mileage may vary The larger mounts that nikon and canon are currently using allow for more optical design options, and make certain challenges easier. That's all. It doesn't mean that everything is better "just because".
These are new mounts, so I'm sure the best is yet to come. Currently, sony's e mount is now the most limited mount - doesn't mean they can't do good lenses, they can, but is more difficult and they will not have as many options for it. Wide lenses are often used in weddings where people are in a small room setting , getting make up for example, certainly a number of set ups in event photography. This is 2. Reviewer is right to call it out if they didn't it for sure would be in the comments.
GonOS No. I have no such examples but its not comparative review. Check out the video review and the YT review of Christopher Frost, they pick out same issues, However come across far for appreciative glowing even of the overall performance.
And if you are just a little bit aware about optical and lens tech, such "problems" aren't even on the table of question as you are aware it is a dumb desire. But nowadays, we have loud experts of final result that have zero knowledge how the technology manage to get that result, but the same genius reviewers have super overly confident feelings how it could be better with zero knowledge to design it, but a never ending capacity to whine about the non achievement of their crazy whishes by tech manufacturer.
Funniest part is that when Nikon release a lens with OOF and creamy result in target, the same reviewers whine that lens does present other caveats It is really well known optic is absolutly not a balance problem at all. Why isn't anyone mentioning that you can buy a dedicated filter holder for this lens from NiSi and a couple of other manufacturers now that allows the use of standard mm filters?
This negates any dicussions on big new filters, just use the ones you own. This is an enormous plus for this lens. Boss, help me — what I need to do?
Only Nikkor! What is that? Only Nikkor S. What is Nikkor S? We have no Nikkor cameras nowhere. How we can test it? Just give him the highest mark we can, it sounds like a great product.
And text will be written by random numbers generator. Maximum is Silver. Man, I always hear people complain about Sony fanboys, but lately it's been the Nikon crowd that is all riled up. Yes, they put filter SIZE as a negative, but they also put filters in the positive. No, the bokeh isn't perfect, and they showed sample images to back it up.
And honestly you think review sites should test multiple copies for every review? Do you realize how much time that would take?
And where would they procure all these lenses from? Copy variation is inherently part of ownership of a lens, if some lenses are less sharp than others, that's still good to know for a prospective customer. And no, the Z7 II did not deserve a gold award. Good ergonomics and ISO 64 iq is not enough for gold. DPR has rated Nikon's products highly with gold in the past.
Stop acting like there is bias just cause your product didn't "win" gold. Agreed, the critique of the critique is of a low standard, and more worthy of cult followers than even Brand fanboys.
Reviewer said what they found and backed it up with evidence. I have to say that I am impressed. I didn't think someone would use this review to write more criticism of Nikon Z's AF I guess that the arrival of the Z9 must generate a lot of stress in some people If you see the other top comments, some people were talking about DPR's supposed bias against Nikon, saying the Z7 II deserved gold along with this lens. That is why I bring it up, so you should be more impressed that people used the lens review to write even more defense of the Z7 II, despite most people saying it's a great camera but people want to indefinitely freak out about one or two negative YouTube videos and act like the whole world is trashing Nikon.
That you mention the Z9 only shows that you too look forward to improved AF from what Nikon currently offers.
And no, I'm not stressed about it. Actually I am excited about it since I am hoping to change systems soon and Nikon is in my top two picks. This has nothing to do with fanboyism. I just think it's weird to blame this lens for the existence of physics. The fact of the matter is that the only valid criticisms for the Z mm are the resolution drop off towards the edges, and the price hike although most of its competitors are very similar in price.
The rest is greedy nitpicking at best, unreasonable wishful thinking at worst. It reeks of a lack of realism and professionalism. It wasn't one fool I picked, it was many fools who upvoted the comment to the most popular tab, so go after them, not me. I was only responding to a conversation they already started, much like you did when you decided to bring up the Z9 to my comment :.
It makes no sense. Lucky it even got a silver award! I tried it for bird photography and the subjects were so small in the frame I could barely see them.
Also took a photo the moon at 14mm and it was tiny! And what about those cheeky Nikon engineers providing that special lens hood for filters. I much preferred the old design where you couldn't fit them so spent less money. Also, I put it at 14mm and stood 12" away from my model to do a portrait, and her nose was like 17" long!
PS the sample images were obviously taken with a cell phone. I swear to God this site isn't even trying anymore. But then again, nobody is. Y'all use for bokeh and portraits I personally use the mm 5. Gotta love that beautiful distortion, which woman doesn't love a nose that appears to be three times it's actual size.
Terrible review. One of the worst I've seen. No comparison photos to the other lenses. Just vague assertions. Learn about its design, performance and how it handles the bamboo wall of doom in this episode of DPReview TV. Chris and Jordan just reviewed the Nikkor Z mm F2. Check out this gallery to see full resolution sample images from their review. This year, despite the disruption, plenty of amazing cameras, lenses, accessories and other products came through our doors.
Now, as the year winds down, we're highlighting some of our standout products of the year. Check out the winners of the DPReview Awards!
Nikon's mirrorless lens roadmap just moved two steps further forward with the launch of the new mm F2. Read on to learn more about these two premium Z-mount lenses.
Sony has just released a trio of impressively small, light, ultrawide lenses for APS-C. These lenses are designed for vloggers, so Chris decided to film himself and find out how they perform. Holy moly, this thing is tiny! We take the adorable Sigma mm F2. Here's what's new and what we think so far We've been able to spend some quality time with Fujifilm's APS-C flagship, and we have plenty of opinions!
How do you make weird lens even weirder? Put a periscope on it! We check out the new Laowa Periprobe 24mm F14 2X and explore some of the creative things you can do with such a bizarre lens.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites.
These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality.
Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
The lens is fully manual and offers a 16mm full-frame equivalent focal length. It features a physical aperture dial, a minimum focusing distance of 25cm 9. This makes DJI the fifth entity to join the L-mount alliance, joining Leica, Leitz Cine, Panasonic and Sigma as partners in the mission to create 'one unified lens mount standard. Do you want to shape and create content for the largest audience of photography and video enthusiasts in the world? Go behind the scenes to see what it takes to shoot some of the most valuable race cars in the world.
Although Adobe says it will eventually make the web-based version of Photoshop free for all to use, the beta testing is currently limited to Canada we're quite sure Chris and Jordan had nothing to do with this, but you never know. Adobe has released a major update to its Lightroom ecosystem that includes video editing capabilities, new preset functionality and much more.
Capture One 22 But what's do these modes achieve? We to look at how data is captured, how it's stored and what benefits you should expect from bit capture. In addition to the new stills and video capture modes for the a1, Sony has also released a minor firmware update for its a7S III full-frame mirrorless camera.
Have you ever come across a 'Pro Mist' or 'Cinebloom' filter and wondered what they do, or why you might want them? This little guide will help you get started on your mist filter journey. For the first time, and aided by the Hubble Space Telescope, researchers have measured the mass of an isolated black hole through the Milky Way Galaxy.
While none of these are deal-breaking issues, here are some the annoying camera quirks that really get under Chris and Jordan's skin. This could be one of Leica's most expensive limited-edition kits if they do end up retailing for the prices they're expected to fetch. Who wouldn't want a camera that looks like R2-D2 from Star Wars? James DeFehr developed Pyro , a film developer that promises extremely fine grain, high contrast, expanded tonal control and long shelf life.
It looks like a promising developer for black and white film enthusiasts. Leica loves a good special edition camera and lens. The annual Comedy Pet Awards photo competition has released a collection of the best images submitted so far, showing off the funny side of all kinds of animals. We go hands-on with the new XF mm F5. To make streaming and controlling your video streams easier and more accessible, Atomos has released the Zato Connect streaming monitor.
You can control video feeds, add effects, and even record backup footage for 'as-live' streaming with the device. Technology component experts Techinsights has posted a detailed analysis to its website confirming Nikon is using a Sony Semiconductor image sensor inside its flagship Z9 mirrorless camera. Firmware v2. Dubblefilm has announced a new ISO color film. The Cinema film promises distinct colors and tones and a halo effect around bright red lights.
Panasonic says the L2 tech tie-up with Leica will not affect the L-mount alliance the two companies share with Sigma. Take a closer look at what the 11mm F1. Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. Now reading: Nikon Z mm F2. Nikon Z mm F2. Nikon Nikkor Z mm F2. Poor Excellent. It's sharp wide open at all focal lengths, and any corner softness is dealt with by stopping down a couple of stops.
Autofocus is swift and silent, and aberrations are very well controlled, with only busy bokeh being our primary concern with this lens, optically.
Landscape photographers and videographers who'll utilize the convenient, though large, filter thread for circular polarizer and neutral density filters. Anyone looking for sharp, wide-angle optics. Portrait photographers looking for the smoothest bokeh; bright-edged out-of-focus highlights can lead to busier blurred backgrounds. Tags: review , lens , nikon. Discuss in the forums See full product details Watch the video review View sample images. We are retrieving offers for your location, please refresh the page to see the prices.
View Comments Comments All Terrible Photographer This looks to be a pretty poor sample of this lens. Also, no coma tests? Jurgen M Lobert This is a prime lens, and likely the new standard, for astro-landscape photographers.
Henderson92 Is this a prime lens? SnapHappy32 Off topic. Just checked your instagram account. A-mazing captures. SnapHappy32 Ecka. A bit confused about what you are implying or otherwise trying to communicate? You on the other hand come across as rude and with a superiority complex. SnapHappy32 And what happens when reviews differ - and one in particular stands out? Maxilopezca Got Z 2. Bigsensorisbest its a collapsing design, I cant stand that unfortunately. Savviest Bigsensorisbest - Life is a series of tradeoffs man.
Bigsensorisbest Savviest I put up with a Canon mm collapsing lens on a M6ii because the results are so good but I wish the lens was just bigger and fixed. Bigsensorisbest I coon. Bigsensorisbest I coon oh good grief you're not understanding, by collapsing I mean a lens where you have to twist it to a given position BEFORE you can use it and the camera will recognise it, then collapse it back to the original position after you have used it. Bigsensorisbest Well they do! Terrible Photographer I agree about not seeing it in the viewfinder.
Z-mounter Yes, that gives you food for thought and makes you doubt the unbiased execution of dpreview Pat Carroll Molloy I use the Kase wolverine magnetic fikters. Savviest I feel like this review harped on things that are trivial when it comes to an ultra wide angle zoom. Savviest Reviewers should be critical of things that actually matter and relate to what the lens was designed for. Jen Bruntnant Too aggressive and busy bokeh.
A Owens Looks like a gold for landscape and bronze for portraiture so a silver overall sounds about right. Ying Yon So many sore Nikon fan boys in the comments. The review is fair. Bigsensorisbest Track. This is most compact and best performing ultra wide zoom lens on the market. Canon is even further behind lenswise are frankly seems to have given up competing.
Impulses There may be a few sore Nikon users here focusing on the review's negatives rather than the overall praise the lens got, but there aren't really many lighter UWA options at all, at least not if you want an f2.
Impulses continued The Z is pretty darn light for this class of lens, if anything I think the biggest misstep in the review is not the Con list it is what it is, and the award thing is meaningless imo but that they kinda minimized the weight difference between this and the Sigma f2. Bigsensorisbest Photography you've got me wondering if I'm in a parallel universe, with the exception of the , canon L lenses are superb, sony primes are the best full frame lenses you could wish for, im only moving out of the system as I cant stand the cameras, all my GFX optics are stellar, I worry I could cut my eyes peeping the files the images are so sharp, and whole I think nikon cameras are a delight, the primes seem to have been designed by a five years, old, long, bulky, primative, compare their fast 50 against the 50 gm prime, is it some kind if joke offering by nikon?
Impulses Heh, so many of these things are so subjective, I like that several of Sony's primes are significantly smaller and often faster AF'ing without optical compromise beyond maybe some focus breathing Bigsensorisbest Impulses that's a valid opinion, but having just left GM primes and looking at nikons lens offerings I can't buy in their system which is really sad, and I've rows of motordriven F2 cameras, F3 F4 F5, FM2T D2x looking at me from the old days on my office shelves..
RaindropDroptop bigsensor Nikon S mount lenses are superb too. Bigsensorisbest Raindrop I can see the s is superb, but where are the 1. RaindropDroptop bigsensor a 85 1. Ying Yon Big is a compromize. RaindropDroptop yin Clearly big is a compromise. Fred Mueller amateur hour review. Bigsensorisbest Careful you'll get thrown off Fred Mueller Do me a favor!
Bigsensorisbest Ooh ProDude It's a fine lens and an obvious choice for a Z mount owner. ProDude well fortunately in MY case using an R5 it is a match made in heaven.
ProDude I understand your sentiment believe me. BasilG "Runs rings around it" - seriously? RaindropDroptop jeff exactly. The sigma seems to suffer less from the bokeh flaws mentioned here on DPR. Impulses " Reverse engineering is not the best to get full compatibility - i didn't want to deal with any issues on my lenses and they all still work great with mirrorless cameras. Impulses continued You can make some arguments about uncompromised optical designs, software corrections and yadda yadda with a prime or other FLs, but the mirrorless flange distance for UWAs is just a massive advantage and it's proven itself pretty clearly across a variety of options now.
BasilG This lens has one major downside - it's really expensive. BasilG Yes, it is true that with the exception of third-party and legacy mount lenses, the fast ultra-wide zoom arena is populated by rather expensive options. RaindropDroptop photo-lover they really said their thoughts were intended for the 35 1.
What else were you expecting? Impulses Where was that? AdamT No mention whatsoever of the Z F4 - which in reality is its biggest rival given that the F2. DarkShift Check some real world comparisons fe. James Grove The 2.
Handiworks Reading all the comments was joyful confirmation of my initial perception of this article having been written with a scripted agenda Astro Landscapes As a nightscape photographer, I have to flat-out disagree with the "findings" of wide-open sharpness falling off so quickly.
Astro Landscapes Also, flat-out, that relatively close-up test image is not as useful for wide-open sharpness testing, period. James Grove I am always interested in the DP reviews, but don't fully agree with the review. Astro Landscapes If you're looking at the sample image they linked, sharpness across the range wide-open is NOT perfect, at all. This is all written like the person is new to photography, it's very strange.
But it's a little heavier. Spectro It was written with a guy with a big fro. Get used to it. Z-mounter This review has a very strange aftertaste. For me, the credibility of dpreview has absolutely lost with this review. Kona Mike Not every lens or camera body is great or the best. Handiworks Agree. Impulses Mike T! As I said below, I am a bit surprised about the lack of enthusiasm in this review. Regards Nilangsu.
Handiworks Me as well Nikon Z desperatly needs something stellar, something that shines. Astro Landscapes nilsjohan, It's clear that you have different priorities and needs as a photographer. Again, with that said, Sony made a "popular" lens, indeed.
RaindropDroptop namesless0ne it vignettes like a crop lens on a full frame sensor and resulted in image degradation issues during editing. Astro Landscapes If you're focusing close-up, you can expect field curvature, but if your subject isn't a brick wall, you can still get impressive sharpness by simply focusing correctly on your subject, wherever it is in the frame.
Mac McCreery I had never thought of an ultra wide zoom as being one for bokeh or portaiture. I know nothing! Gon0S attomole I always wonder why some revierwers always have to whine because that really excellent UWA zoom lens does not have the optical qualities they see in a telephoto zoom lens, and vice versa.
You have no examples, because there exist no example. Eric Calabros "Front filters are huge". Looper55 Why isn't anyone mentioning that you can buy a dedicated filter holder for this lens from NiSi and a couple of other manufacturers now that allows the use of standard mm filters? DRDL Yes, this is very relevant and should be in the review.
Alex Hanin Or maybe "Junior" honestly thought this lens is worth a Silver award. Yeah I know, that sound outlandish. Djehuty Well if Sony is getting the hate on a Nikon lens review then they must be doing something right. Kharan The fact of the matter is that the only valid criticisms for the Z mm are the resolution drop off towards the edges, and the price hike although most of its competitors are very similar in price. AccursedSpermaceti Lucky it even got a silver award!
EXkurogane Y'all use for bokeh and portraits I personally use the mm 5. Joe Bagadonuts Your studio in a stadium? But nice joke about the joke as well! Savviest And I use a fisheye for reproduction work. Photoman It does have a dual card Magnar W What do you think about the lens? You may also like.
More about gear in this article. Latest sample galleries. Sigma mm F2. Sony E 11m F1. Sony E 15mm F1. See more galleries ». Latest in-depth reviews. Read more reviews ». Latest buying guides. Best cameras for landscape photography in Best drones in Best video cameras for photographers in Best cameras for Instagram in Check out more buying guides ».
Discover more challenges ». Jun 15, 14 lens news. Jun 15, 6. We're hiring! DPReview is looking for a Reviews Editor. Jun 15, 10 Sponsored. Adobe says Photoshop for web will be free for everyone Jun 14, Adobe Lightroom updates: Video editing, new presets, more AI and other key improvements.
A bit confused: what's a HEIF and why do we need bit stills and video? Sony brings 8K bit video, reduced res lossless Raw stills to its flagship a1 camera via firmware update.
Jun 13, Jun 13, 70 lens news. What are 'mist filters' and what do they do to your photographs? Hubble determines the mass of an isolated black hole speeding around the Milky Way Galaxy. Jun 12, Jun 11, video. Jun 10, Photographer uses AI to create unique camera designs inspired by pop culture.
Jun 10, 58 video. Film Friday: Is Pyro the next great film developer?
-
Looking for: Vmware fusion 11 pro discount code free download Click here to DOWNLOAD Vmware fusion 11 pro discount code free downl...
